Harley Seegert v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc., and DOES 1 through 20
Seegert v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro Inc.
37-2017-00016131-CU-MC-CTL

Frequently Asked Questions

 

Expand/Collapse All
  • The Action alleges that Defendant P.F. Chang's utilized a Credit Card Transaction Form that contained preprinted spaces designated for filling in the telephone number and email address of the cardholder in violation of the Song Beverly Credit Card Act, Civil Code section 1747.08. Plaintiff sought civil penalties and attorneys' fees and costs, among other relief. P.F. Chang's denies violating California Civil Code section 1747.08 or any wrongdoing and any liability whatsoever.

    The issuance of the Notice is NOT an expression of the Court's opinion on the merits or the lack of merits of any of the Plaintiff's claims in the Action or whether P.F. Chang's engaged in any wrongdoing.

    For information about how to learn about what has happened in the Action to date, please see FAQ 19 below.

  • In a class action lawsuit, one or more people called "Representative Plaintiffs" (in this Action, the Representative Plaintiff is Harley Seegert) sue on behalf of other people who may potentially have similar claims. For purposes of this proposed Settlement, one court will resolve the issues for all Class Members, except for those people who properly exclude themselves from the Class, as explained in FAQ 13 below. The company sued in this case is P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.

  • The Representative Plaintiff made claims against P.F. Chang's. P.F. Chang's denies that it has done anything wrong or violated any statute and admits no liability. The Court has not decided whether the Representative Plaintiff or P.F. Chang's should win this Action. Instead, both sides agreed to a Settlement. That way, they avoid the cost of a trial, and the Class Members will receive relief now rather than years from now, if at all.

  • The Court has decided that everyone who fits this description is a Class Member for purposes of the proposed Settlement: "all persons who engaged in a credit card transaction at a California P.F. Chang's Restaurant during the Class Period, during which Defendant provided a Credit Card Transaction Form that contained a space that allowed the credit cardholder to fill in his or her personal identification information. Excluded from the Class are Defendant, its officers, directors, employees, and attorneys, and the judge presiding over the Action." The term "Class Period" means May 3, 2016 until February 22, 2019. The term "California P.F. Chang's Restaurant" means any P.F. Chang's branded restaurant located in the State of California.

  • If you are still not sure whether you are included, you can write the Settlement Administrator for free help. You may contact them by email at info@SeegertVPFChangsSettlement.com, or by mail at Seegert v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc., c/o JND Legal Administration, PO Box 91323, Seattle, WA 98111-9423.

  • All Class Members who do not opt-out of the Class Settlement and submit a valid and timely Claim Form shall receive a cash settlement in the form of a check up to a maximum of $1,000 to be issued by the Settlement Administrator from the Net Settlement Fund. The Net Settlement Fund is the amount remaining from the total $1,000,000 Maximum Settlement Amount to be funded by P.F. Chang's, minus the attorneys' fees and costs to be paid to Class Counsel, the award to Named Plaintiff for bringing this Action, and the costs of the Settlement Administrator for providing notice to the Class of the Settlement and administering the settlement. The actual amount of the cash settlement distributed to each Class Member will be determined by the number of qualifying Claims approved by the Settlement Administrator. The actual amount of the cash settlements will be approximately $550,000 divided by the number of timely and valid Claims submitted. For instance, if there are 2,500 claims, each Claimant will receive approximately $220. If there are 55,000 claims, each Claimant will receive approximately $10. Cash settlements are limited to one per Authorized Claimant regardless of the number of transactions entered into by the Authorized Claimant during the Class Period. Any funds left over in the Net Settlement Fund due to, e.g., the operation of the $1,000 cap or uncashed checks will be provided to the Cy Pres Beneficiaries¬≠ - the Consumer Federation of California and the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.

  • The deadline to submit a claim was June 7, 2019.

  • As described in FAQ 17, the Court held a hearing on July 12, 2019 to decide whether to approve this Settlement. This hearing has been continued to August 2, 2019.  If the Court approves the Settlement after that, there may be appeals. It's always uncertain whether these appeals can be resolved, and resolving them can take time, perhaps more than a year. You can check on the progress of the case on this website. Please be patient.

  • The Court has ordered that Carlson Lynch LLP and Stonebarger Law Group, APC ("Class Counsel") to represent the interests of all Class Members. You will not be separately charged for these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense.

  • Class Counsel will request up to $333,000 total for their attorneys' fees and $25,000 for costs. The Court will make the final decision as to the amounts to be paid to Class Counsel.

  • Plaintiff will request a service award (also known as "incentive" award) of up to $5,000 total for his services as class representative and his efforts in bringing the Action. The Court will make the final decision as to the amount to be paid to the class representative.

  • If the Court approves the proposed Settlement, unless you exclude yourself from the Settlement, you will be releasing your claims against P.F. Chang's. This generally means that you will not be able to file a lawsuit, continue prosecuting a lawsuit, or be part of any other lawsuit regarding the allegations in the Action. The Settlement Agreement, available on the Important Documents page, contains the full terms of the release.

  • The deadline to exclude yourself from the Class and the Settlement was June 7, 2019.

    If you timely requested exclusion from the Class, you will be excluded from the Class, you will not be bound by the judgment entered in the Action, and you will not be precluded from prosecuting any timely, individual claim against P.F. Chang's based on the conduct complained of in the Action. If you filed a Claim Form and requested exclusion, your request for exclusion will be deemed invalid.

  • At the date, time, and location stated in FAQ 17 below, the Court will hold a Fairness Hearing to determine if the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and to also consider Class Counsel's request for an award of attorneys' fees and costs, and service awards to the Representative Plaintiff.

    The deadline for submitting a timely request for exclusion and wish to object to the fairness, reasonableness or adequacy of the Settlement Agreement or the proposed Settlement, or to the award of attorneys' fees and costs or the service awards was June 7, 2019.

    IF YOU DID NOT TIMELY MAKE YOUR OBJECTION, YOU WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED ALL OBJECTIONS AND WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO SPEAK AT THE FAIRNESS HEARING.

    If you submitted a written objection, you may appear at the Fairness Hearing, either in person or through personal counsel hired at your expense, to object to the Settlement Agreement. You are not required, however, to appear. The deadline for submitting a Notice of Intention to Appear at the Fairness Hearing was June 7, 2019.

  • Objecting is simply telling the Court that you don't like something about the Settlement. You can object only if you stay in the Settlement Class. Excluding yourself is telling the Court that you don't want to be part of the Settlement Class. If you exclude yourself, you have no basis to object because the Settlement no longer affects you.

  • The Court has preliminarily approved the Settlement and will hold a hearing to decide whether to give final approval to the Settlement. The purpose of the Fairness Hearing will be for the Court to determine whether the Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class; to consider the award of attorneys' fees and expenses to Class Counsel; and to consider the request for a service award to the Representative Plaintiff.

  • On July 12, 2019 at 1:30 p.m., a hearing was held on the fairness of the proposed Settlement. This hearing has been continued to August 2, 2019 at 1:30 p.m.  At the hearing, the Court will be available to hear any objections and arguments concerning the proposed Settlement's fairness. The hearing will take place before the Honorable Katherine Bacal in Department 69 of the San Diego County Superior Court, located at the Hall of Justice Courthouse, 330 West Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101.

    The hearing may be postponed to a different date or time or location without notice. Please check this website for any updates about the Settlement generally or the Fairness Hearing specifically. If the date or time of the Fairness Hearing changes, an update to this Settlement website will be the only way you will be informed of the change.

  • At that hearing, the Court will be available to hear any objections and arguments concerning the fairness of the Settlement.

    You may attend, but you do not have to. As described above in FAQ 14, you may speak at the Fairness Hearing only if (a) you have timely submitted an objection, and (b) you have timely submitted a Notice of Intent to Appear (which may be combined with the objection).

    If you have requested exclusion from the Settlement, however, you may not speak at the Fairness Hearing.

  • To see a copy of the Settlement Agreement, the Court's Preliminary Approval Order, Class Counsel's application for attorneys' fees and costs (after they are filed), and the operative complaint filed in the Action, please visit the Important Documents page. Alternatively you may contact the Settlement Administrator by email at info@SeegertVPFChangsSettlement.com, or by mail at Seegert v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc., c/o JND Legal Administration, PO Box 91323, Seattle, WA 98111-9423.

    This description of the Action is general and does not cover all of the issues and proceedings that have occurred. In order to see the complete file, you should visit the Clerk's office at the San Diego County Superior Court, located at the Hall of Justice Courthouse, 330 West Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101. The Clerk will tell you how to obtain the file for inspection and copying at your own expense.

  • It is your responsibility to inform the Settlement Administrator of your updated information. You may do so by email to info@SeegertVPFChangsSettlement.com, or by mail to the address below:

    Seegert v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
    c/o JND Legal Administration
    PO Box 91323
    Seattle, WA 98111-9423

For More Information

Visit this website often to get the most up-to-date information.

Mail

Seegert v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro Inc.
c/o JND Legal Administration
PO Box 91323
Seattle, WA 98111-9423